OPINION by Iqbal Jassat
That it was able to withstand a nuclear power whose military is equipped with the most sophisticated weapons of mass destruction during an intense 50 day period of carpet bombings, speaks to the enormity of its victory.
The asymmetrical conditions that favoured Israel included the fact that as the Occupier its suffocating siege of the open air prison restricted people’s movement.
Another crucial factor to consider is that the current wave of massacres and wholesale slaughter followed massive destruction of Gaza very recently during “Cast Lead”.
How was it possible for a non-state resistance movement in a repressive, confined and besieged territory occupied by the aggressor to regroup, rearm and valiantly defend the population in such a short space of time?
Its a question many military experts and specialist students of guerilla warfare will grapple with for a long time.
And though the secret of its success may not be known, one area in which consensus does exist is that Hamas’ refusal to lose denied Israel a victory it desperately sought.
So while the celebrations continue and reconstruction commences earnestly, Gaza will bear testimony that its martyrs’ blood will ultimately lead to justice for all of Palestine.
The internal bloodletting within Netanyahu’s corridors of power is beginning to escalate into more than a brawl or a dog-fight.
From whether its elite soldiers were adequately equipped to engage in hand-to-hand combat with resistance fighters, to whether its intelligence failed to correctly predict the outcome, is the nature of the dissension in Israel.
More importantly that its slaughter of babies and entire families has evoked unprecedented global outrage against it, is yet another manifestation of the fact that Israel has also lost in the court of public opinion.
There is very little Netanyahu can do to salvage his reputation internally as a weak coward and externally as a war criminal. His failure is symptomatic of the failure of Israel as a settler colonial project. The question of “security” it regularly uses as a crutch to tap sympathy is rapidly evaporating.
A sampling of opinions within South Africa attests to this. A number of heavyweight political commentators and media analysts have pronounced their views on Israel which cannot by any stretch of the imagination be dismissed as antisemitic.
In essence the Steven Friedmans, Aubrey Matshiqis, Ebrahim Fakirs and Eusebius McKaisers along with the Josh Broombergs of South Africa have taken public positions critical of Israel.
Will Israel survive this humiliation brought about by its failure to achieve any of its goals?
Or will it continue along a path of self-destruction?
Will America realise the folly of pursuing failed policies that keeps it entrapped in a region where disengagement requires unbundling from Israel as an immediate urgent remedy for its woes?
The days to follow will present new questions as fresh challenges arise, however as far as the Palestinians are concerned, they remain firmly committed to their freedom struggle. The current major victory brings them closer to ultimately overcome the apartheid juggernaut. VOC