Voice of the Cape

From the news desk

Mecca – a City of Cultural Genocide

Share this article
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

The Hajj, the performance of the Islamic pilgrimage in the precincts of Mecca, coincides with the festival of ‘Eid ul-Adha. This is a festival that is celebrated globally by all Muslims who are not on the Hajj.

So for 1, 5 billion Muslims worldwide, there is a simultaneous convergence of devotional focus.

Whilst 3 million gather on the plain of ‘Arafat outside Mecca in a purified state, followed by rituals laid down by the prophets Abraham and Muhammad, the rest of the community enjoys a family day.

‘Eid ul-Adha – literally meaning “joyful sacrifice” – commemorates Abraham being asked to sacrifice his first-born son, and a ram being substituted in his place. The Hajj, one of the five pillars of Islam, is translated as “sacred journey”.

In the digital age that we live in, the Hajj is followed step-by-step via cable TV, and even Facebook. It enjoys a “World Cup” audience of millions, making it now one of the most-watched annual events on the planet.

With the accessibility of our age has also come the ease of air-travel, and in the 21st century, the Saudi Arabian authorities have had to restrict numbers. The demographics of the Hajj is that demand far outstrips supply.

The plains of ‘Arafat and Mina, which are the terrain of the Hajj, can only accommodate up to 3 million pilgrims. And haunted by the memory of deadly stampedes, the Saudi kingdom has embarked upon an ambitious re-development programme costing billions of dollars.

This will see Mecca becoming one of the most modern cities in the world. By 2012, the Saudis want to cater for 10 million pilgrims with 130 high-rise hotels, rail shuttles and state-of-the-art shopping centres.

Part of Mecca’s urban re-shaping involves a giant clock being constructed atop a 76-story hotel. This clock, which will also denote prayer times, will be visible from 17 kilometres.

According to Arab News, the clock is response to a scholarly gathering in Doha in 2008. It agreed that Mecca should be the meridian of the Muslim world. This was based on the observation that if one spread-out the world map, Mecca would emerge as its physical centre.

With Mecca’s clock-face being 80 metres in height and 65 metres wide, it is many times bigger than London’s Big Ben. Sitting atop a 500 metre building in a dizzy amphitheatre of six other 40-story buildings, it’s the biggest and highest clock in the world.

However, whilst Mecca’s space-age developments may dazzle the eye, in the Muslim world there is a sense of great disquiet; a sense of disquiet made only worse by the startling silence of Muslim governments on what has happened to Islam’s holy places in the name of progress.

Many analysts feel that whilst change has been necessary in Mecca, it should not have occurred at the expense of the city’s sacred memory. For behind the façade of Saudi modernism and materialism lurks one of the biggest scandals of the modern era – the wanton and wilful destruction of Islamic heritage.

Mainstream scholars, such as Cape Town’s Shaikh Seraj Hendricks, have observed that Islam has been held to ransom by the whims of Saudi’s puritanical Wahhabi scholars, who deem the honour of historical sites as polytheistic.

For them heritage is something that you destroy, because in their jaundiced eyes, people worship the sites.

These, incidentally, are the militant scholars who applauded the Taliban’s demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas in Afghanistan, and whose chief mufti, the late Shaikh Bin Baz, once ruled that the earth was flat

These scholars, whose obscurantist credo was founded in the desert over 200 years ago by the arch-extremist Ibn ‘Abd ul-Wahhab, have been accused of destroying Islam’s cultural heritage in the very heartland of Islam.

This is the equivalent of the church bulldozing the Via Dolorosa in Jerusalem because pilgrims might worship its stones. Or the Rabbis dynamiting the tomb of Maimonides in Tiberias.

The Washington-based Gulf Institute records that in two-decades the Saudi government has countenanced the destruction of 95% of Islam’s historical buildings, tombs and wells – most of them relating directly to the life of the prophet Muhammad.

Dr Sami Angawi, a Saudi architect, says today that less than 20 of 300 historical sites remain in Saudi Arabia. He told The Independent that we were witnessing the “last days” of Mecca.

Dr ‘Irfan Ahmad al-‘Alawi, founder and former director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation, is a London-based barrister who owns a house in Mecca. As a descendant of the house of Muhammad, he reckons that less than 10% of Mecca’s heritage remains, and soon even that will be gone.

He points to the desacralisation of Mecca. In the 1980’s the monarchy constructed a palace on Jabl Qubais, a mountain overlooking the holy city where the prophet Muhammad performed the miracle of the splitting moon, and where Adam is believed to lie buried.

“In the 1990’s they built a toilet over the foundations of a house belonging to the prophet’s first wife, Khadijah. This is where a prophet of God prayed, where his children were born,” he noted, adding that Islam’s first school – and the house of the prophet’s best friend, Abu Bakr, had been demolished for the Hilton Hotel.

“It is incredible how little respect is paid by the Saudis to the house of God,” he said.

In 2004 the old Turkish fort in the Al-Ajyad district was demolished to make way for another hotel, an enraged Turkish government describing the demolition as “cultural genocide”.

Even the waters of Zamzam – the well discovered by Ishmael’s Egyptian mother, Hajira – have been affected. Dr Alawi reports that builders blasting rock damaged and cracked the eye of the 3, 000 year old well.

Dr ‘Alawi notes that the birthplace of Muhammad (used as a cattle market by the Wahhabis in the 1920’s) is another victim.

“In any other religion, this would be a sacred site like the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, but here it’s destroyed.”

“Even the ground of the historical Jannat ul-Mu’alla graveyard, where the prophet’s wife is buried, is now awash in sewage due to poor town planning,” he said.

Denial from Saudi quarters has been adamant.

Prince Turki al-Faisal was quoted as saying by The Independent in 2006 that Saudi Arabia would preserve its historical sites.

“[We are aware] how important the preservation of this heritage is, not just to us but to the millions of Muslims from around the world ….It is hardly something we are going to allow to be destroyed,” he told reporter Daniel Howden.

Unfortunately, his rebuttal sits at odds with reality. Future generations of Muslims visiting Mecca will face an ugly urban landscape totally devoid of history.


Share this article
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Comments

comments

2 comments

  1. I agree with you on the importance of preserveing old architecture for lessons in history for latter generations but you can’t argue from a purely quraanic position that this is wajib.Mordernity have brought difficult chalenges at the feet of the Saudis bro.

  2. Well pointed, Shafiq! I have been trying to gain acceptance of the messages in the following, without success:-

    Begin forwarded message:

    From:
    Date: 31 October 2010 13:04:20 GMT+02:00
    To:
    Subject: Fwd: Hajj coverage

    As Salaamu Alaikum.

    I present you with an urgent topic for discussion and publication.

    Needless to say, but I have refrained from viewing Hajj and Umrah coverage since that disgusting experience.

    Kindly forward to others with the influence to change Muslim thinking.

    BaarakAllahu-feekum
    ========
    Mahmood
    North Beach, Durban
    “No Olympics Here, For Africa Sake!”

    Begin forwarded message:

    From:
    Date: 2 November 2009 23:41:32 GMT+02:00
    To:
    Subject: Hajj coverage

    As Salaamu Alaikum. What I have to say may not go down well, but it is something that may not have been considered by the Saudis, the world media and Muslims in general.

    It is undeniable that the Hajj is the most intimate interaction between Muslims and Allah. Yet the world media, with the blessings of the so-called ‘Custodians of the Two Musjids’, have cast that intimacy into the public domain. Viewers have been treated to scenes of sobbing men and women, who have had their ‘me-time’ with their Creator spied upon by the telephoto lenses of high-tech equipment. And, amongst others, scenes at the stoning of the symbolic Shaitaan with determination etched on their faces – one on-line newspaper used the word ‘grimace’.

    How long this invasion of privacy been going on is anyone’s guess, but what I saw last year left me cursing the Saudis for allowing such close-up images from even being captured, let alone broadcast. The Haramain and therefore Hajj and Umrah have long been out-of-bounds for non-Muslims. Yet the Saudis circumvent that ban by taking the Hajj to the non-Muslims. At the same time the personal and private time of pilgrims with their Creator is made public, and at times interfered with, when pilgrims become aware of the cameras.

    Despite the fact that English is the most widely spoken language in the world, the coverage by Iqra TV (last year) would easily create an impression that Islam is for Arabic-speakers. The presence of cameras and reporters amongst pilgrims distracted many, as was evident by their display of ‘nafs’ (pride) by waving and trying to get on the tapes of various cameras.

    With the demands of Hajj, one cannot but wonder at the quality of the niyyat (intentions) and supplications of those making despatches to TV and radio stations worldwide. Perhaps theirs was a ‘working’ Hajj? Likewise of those using cellphones to ‘keep in touch’.

    I suppose some Fatwah will justify the Saudi decisions. But, intrinsically, the admission of non-Muslims to traditionally out-of-bounds areas and the violation of intimate moments of pilgrims beseeching Allah are both wrong.

    Strangely, with all the technology employed by the Saudis, they have failed to install an adequate public address system. This failure necessitates the employment of a ‘repeater’ to pronounce Takbir, Sajda, Qiyam, Jalsa, etc after the Imam during Salaah. Shame.

    My call to Muslims is that they do not invade the privacy of pilgrims by viewing images that allows them to distinguish people performing the rituals.

    My call to the media houses is that they re-think their reporting strategies to exclude close-up images, especially during the performance of the rituals.

    My call to the Saudis is to pronounce a ban on the use of cameras during the days of Hajj, when pilgrims are in Ihraam. This type of ban was once in place. It is time to re-introduce it.

    Mahmood Vawda
    Durban
    South Africa

    End of forwarded message

    A suggestion is that Muslims around the world unite to precipitate the financial ruin of those exploiting them in their niyyat to make the Hajj and Umrah. This can be achieved by declaring a moratorium, extending several years, on the performance of Hajj and Umrah. As you know, this has worked in the early days of Islam.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WhatsApp WhatsApp us