The Halal Industry, Preying Unmercifully on People’s Insecurity and Ignorance

6

photo46I’M a non-smoker, but when I read the Cape Argus headline that the South African National Halal Authority had banned smoking, I laughed like a drain.

SANHA is one of the four Halal certification bodies in South Africa which certifies that foodstuffs are permissible under Shari’ah, or Sacred Law. Halal is very similar to Jewish Kosher. Often Halal and Kosher stamps share the same space as Muslims can consume kosher products.

But after I’d picked myself up from the floor and wiped the tears from my eyes, I realised that this was a serious moment too. For if SANHA had delivered a fatwa (a judicial opinion) on smoking there would be repercussions.

Smoking may indeed be detrimental to one’s health, but SANHA was a certifying body and not a judiciary like, for example, Cape Town’s Muslim Judicial Council. In other words, SANHA was not authorised to issue religious edicts.

And yet it seemed to have done that, its proclamation headed by the statement: “Don’t Kiss up to the Kiss of Death.”

Whilst scholars of Al-Azhar in Egypt have moved to declare smoking haram, or impermissible, the fact is that the majority of legal scholars still consider it legally permitted – but only in the sense that it borders on the disliked.

There is no mention of smoking in Qur’anic texts or Prophetic traditions. Its permissibility has always been a question of scholastic deduction in which differences of opinion have to be respected.

When I contacted Maulana Saeed Navlakhi, a spokesperson for SANHA, he told me that the organisation had just issued a media “alert” about ingredients used in the manufacture of cigarettes. 

He said that studies in Australia and the Netherlands had revealed that pig derivatives (prohibited in Islam) had been used in the chemical make-up of cigarette filters.

When confronted with the comments of the local tobacco industry (published in the Cape Argus) that they did not use such products, he replied that SANHA had not banned smoking.

“We have not banned cigarettes. In terms of our religious responsibility this was just an alert to the Muslim consumer who should not be smoking anyway,” he explained.

However, whether SANHA issued a fatwa or not, South African Muslims are facing an increasingly rugged terrain of nit-picking do’s and don’ts with regards to halal products. Smoking is but the most recent example. And if the truth be told, halalisation world-wide has become big business.

But unfortunately, it’s a multi-million rand industry that preys unmercifully upon consumer insecurity and ignorance. It also capitalises on producers who, fearing a loss of sales from their Muslim customers, are forced to join the halal bandwagon.

The bewildered South African Muslim consumer now faces growing lists of products deemed legally doubtful by the certifiers. Indeed, it could be said that the sultans of halal now tyrannise the supermarket shelves – right down to hot-cross buns.

That doubt should have entered the equation is scandalous, as in Islam doubt is regarded as a reprehensible thing. All Islamic legal scholars agree that the foundational principle of Sacred Law is its permissibility.

This is why, as the famous legal scholar Shaikh Yusuf Qaradhawi explains, Muslims can happily eat at the tables of Jews and Christians.

 In other words, in Islam things are permissible before they can become impermissible – not the other way round. That is the law of the universe. Yet in many cases, I would accuse the halal bodies of flouting this very principle.

 I would accuse them of engendering the idea that everything around us is impermissible until it gets their halal stamp. This back-to-front, upside-down legal theology seems to have as its departure point, the assumption that all Muslim consumers should never be able to think for themselves.

 If one bears in mind that most products only become legally impermissible through intensive contact with impurities such as the flesh of swine, alcohol, urine or faeces, the application of products deemed “halal” today is mind-boggling in its range.

 For instance, my random rifling through the grocery cupboard at home reveals that spring water, spaghetti, macaroni, oats, tuna, pilchards, cocoa, coffee and cornflakes have halal stamps on them. That all of these products are fundamentally permissible by their very nature seems to have escaped the notice of the zealous certifiers.

 Without doubt, the most astonishing “halal” product here is the spring water. With all bottlers filtering their water (thus rendering it legally pure) one wonders how this particular company was persuaded to pay for a halal stamp.

 Yet another example of this legalistic pedantry was when I discovered a halal toothpick in one of our local airline meal packs. On one end was halal stamp, and on the other was a kosher one. “Put a crucifix in the middle and we’ve solved the Middle-East problem,” joked my companion.

 Of course, one of the biggest problems when a person deliberately splits the hair is that embarrassing paradoxes emerge. That’s why I could find a packet of halal bacon-flavoured noodles in a Far Eastern country. The flavour was entirely artificial.

 Let it be said: I’m not against responsible halal certification. But the sense that a fundamentalist thread is weaving its way through the halal industry is growing in the community.

 People are becoming sick and tired of fanaticism; a legalistic fanaticism which they say doesn’t represent the ethos of the Prophet Muhammad, a person of compassion and kindness who, traditions say, actively prevented his companions from indulging in pedantry.

 “If he had the easier choice of two, he (the Prophet) would always prefer the easier one,” reports his wife A’isha, who also said that Muhammad – peace on him – was a man of moderation.

And to add to this, the Prophet himself had once said that Islam, like any religion, was a powerful thing. He warned that if people made it difficult for themselves, Islam would make it even more difficult for them.

Share this article
  • 4
    Shares

6 Comments

  1. Shafiq, great read. I own a butchery shop and a few years ago won a contract to supply one of the chains to pack meat for them (completely seperate from non-halaal meat). No sooner done then a big wig from the MJC Halaal trust pitches up and demands I pay up the “annual halaal certicate fee”. I said, I am muslim so why do I need to become halaalified?. The arrogant sheikh said, Listen buster either you pay or we shut you down. This mafia tactics is rife across the board. WHile you are about it, dig into their annual audits and see how quickly you will be shot down.

  2. Brother Shafiq
    Your article reflects your gross ignorance of the concept of halaal eg you pose the question as to why a tootpick needs to be certified as halaal. Do you not know that some chinese toothpicks are coated with pig fat?You also ask why cornflakes needs to be certified halaal. Answer is simple – to ensure that it has no gelatine like Pro Nutro does. Please research properly in future or consult the Ulama if you are unsure. Your article appeared in the Daily News in Durban and only served to make Muslims look like fools.

  3. hey there and thank you for your information – I’ve definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise a few technical points using this web site, since I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to I could get it to load properly. I had been wondering if your web hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your high-quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a lot more of your respective interesting content. Make sure you update this again soon..

  4. Mohummud Yaaseen on

    AA brothers

    I think Brother Shafiq has made a strong point. There is a lot of money made in the halaal certification industry and the people who run these industries may, unfortunately, be motivated my profits (though this is only my assumption based on what I’ve experienced in human nature). However, there is a need for halaal certification (which brother Shafiq doesn’t deny), but not as profit making ventures. Halaalarization should be done for altruistic Godly reasons and not for profit. That would guarantee a lot less suspicion and will encourage an atmosphere of trust.

    If people no longer trust the motives of learned people it is because the learned people (not all, but we tend to generalize) have warranted mistrust through their conduct. It is unnatural for people not to believe and trust learned men in a situation where they uphold the goals of the religion respectfully. In my limited experience, I feel that the broader issue here is that learned men level themselves as equal with God in that they are no longer God fearing in their legislation and in their abusing the religion for short sighted ends. Religion can never be for greed, and for too long it has been

Leave A Reply