From the news desk

Judge Traverso must step down: SOPOC

Share this article
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Gauteng based group, the Society for the Protection of our Constitution, has added its voice to growing calls for Judge Jeanette Traverso be removed from the Shrien Dewani trial.

In a letter written to the Provincial Director of Public Prosecutions, Rodney de Kock, Advocate Zehir Omar has urged Judge Traverso to postpone the trial in order to delay judgment in Dewani’s application to be discharged and acquitted on Monday. Omar has also asked prosecutors to apply for Traverso’s recusal.

The basis of the application is that Judge Treverso has been “impartial and unfair”. According to Omar, the public foresees Dewani to be a free man but would instead have her step down before she hands down the judgement. According to Section 174 of Act 51 of 1977, Judge Traverso had already made a judgement in favour of the accused.

“The comments by Judge Traverso when she asked Advocate Mopp (representative of the state) if he agreed whether evidence of the single material witness of the state was poor and remained uncorroborated. That question was unnecessary because the Judges function was to adjudicate upon the section 174 application,” Omar argued.

This means that the accused Shrien Dewani will not need to stand trial and will not need to answer the many questions that the public has.

“Why did Dewani so hastily leave the scene of the murder? Why did Dewani become so close with people involved in the murder of his wife? Why did Dewani not disclose his sexuality to Anni and her family?” asked Omar. “These are questions that must be asked.”

“Our country still subscribes to the Roman Dutch Common Law. Justice must not only be done, but seen to be done. This means that if the judge acts fair and unbiased but the public perceives this as unfair and biased, then justice is not been done. This is especially so in criminal cases and a dilemma that is faced in the Shrien Dewani trial.”

The public’s reaction is paramount in the judgement being handed down. Omar is urging the public to join the campaigns for justice in the Dewani case.

“There are some talks on twitter. We can’t allow women to be abused in this fashion. We saw this is the Oscar Pistorius trial but luckily the state is appealing”

SOPOC’s letter follows a petition launched by a new group called Justice4Anni. This support group have called on Justice Minister Michael Masutha investigate Traverso’s conduct. They claim she is clearly favouring the defence team and has been aggressive to the state prosecution.

The court will reconvene on Monday 8th December to determine the future of accused Shrien Dewani.

Omar said the organisation may apply to join the matter as a friend of the court. VOC (Nishta Sookdiyal)


Share this article
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

1 comment

  1. Judge Traverso is very clever. By asking Mopp the above question , she’s getting him to admit that he has no grounds for objection to dismissing the case. So after he admits to the Judge that the single material witness ‘s evidence was poor and uncorroborated he’s indirectly agreeing to the dismissal of the case!

    I seriously doubt that Judge Traverso would be asked to step down by the Head of Prosecution. The consequence of that would be unrepairable damage to the reputation of the South Africa’s Judiciary . It would be indirectly admitting to the world that their second most senior judge was bias for the Defence and against the Prosecution. She would be held accountable .Questions would be asked as to why she was favouring the Defence. It would be humiliating for South Africa. ,Further it would would open the ‘flood gates’ , as other people on other cases could then do the same . And that would cause a lot of problems for the South African Legal System and their Judiciary.

    It appears to the public that Judge Traverso has made up her mind and is going to dismiss the Case on Monday. If due to public pressure she decides that the Case will continue , will it make a vast difference to the outcome of the Case? Mopp is terrified of her . He’s probably scared that if he goes against her , he will never work in the Legal Profession again .

    If Shrien were to take The Stand , what would be proved? Mopp in fear of reprisal from Judge Traverso would not ask Shrien the leading questions that he should be asked. The Public want a Prosecutor who is strong , fearless, highly skilled , is a warrior for justice , and is fair but is relentless until he/she gets the absolute truth from the Accused. The Prosecutor ideal for the role is Nell.

    The pressure groups eg the Facebook Justice for Anni Group etc, have more of a fighting chance to have a positive outcome of the Case by strongly requesting that the current Prosecution Team step down. They should respectfully request that Nell and his team , take over. Then they should add more public pressure to get Shrien to take the Witness Stand . Shrien would not be able to match the intellect of Nell. Nell will not readily accept Shrien’s version of events. Nell would be able to get the truth from Shrien or show him to be a liar.

    It would be a travesty for the Case to be dismissed on Monday. The Public of the world deserve justice. Anni’s parents deserve justice. If democracy truly exists the Case will continue.

WhatsApp WhatsApp us
Wait a sec, saving restore vars.